Chinul
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14169/1416979e5047eddaa704a6f5f72c92290a954c15" alt=""
Chinul’s approach to Buddhist practice ended up becoming an interesting blend of gongan (J. kōan) meditation, coupled with scriptural study, incorporating the Hwom (Ch. Huayan) approach that tended to see the mutual containment of ostensive opposites. From the Chinese Chan master Dahui, Chinul incorporated the huàguān (話觀’observing the key phrase of the kōan’ ) method into his practice. This form of meditation remains the main method taught in Korean Sŏn down to modern times. Yet on the other hand, Chinul believed that scriptural study was a vitally important component of Buddhist cultivation. This approach is enunciated in the oft-repeated adage that Chinul did not undergo his enlightenment experiences as the result of the classical so-called personal ‘mind-to-mind transmission’ between teacher and student as characterized in the Sŏn school. Rather, each of his three enlightenment experiences came in connection with the contemplation of a passage in a Buddhist text. In his final articulation of the issue of the relationship between sŏn (meditative practice) and gyo (scriptural study), Chinul was highly influenced by the explanation of the relationship between practice and study provided by the Tang Huayan master Li Tongxuan (李通玄; 635-730). Chinul’s philosophical resolution of this issue brought a deep and lasting impact on Korean Buddhism, and can be seen as repeated theme in the works of numerous subsequent Sŏn masters, including such famous figures as Gihwa (己和 1376-1433) and Hyujeong (休靜 1520-1604), who followed Chinul’s way of thinking in addressing the issue of practice and study in their own writings.
Photo:Chinul Puril Pojo Daesa
Labels: zen
1 Comments:
Paul,
thank you for posting this information. It's always a pleasure to learn something new.
Gassho,
Uku
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home